|
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) regulates automobile manufacturers to try to protect consumers. NHTSA also broadcasts information on recalls, safety problems, vehicle testing, and research. Featured on our website is some information about safety ratings for vehicles based on the NHTSA static stability factor formula.
The proposed rating system was based on equal intervals of risk and positioned
the five-star level at a value of SSF achievable by favorably
designed family sedans. It also positioned the one-star range
where it captured some popular SUVs and pickup trucks of the
recent past. The manufacturers of the one-star vehicles generally
have improved the current versions of the equivalent vehicles
to the two-star level, but we believe the one-star rating
ceiling would be stringent enough to discourage companies
from returning to old design practices or from importing less
advanced vehicles.
A fortuitous feature of the ratings based
on the linear regression curve was that reasonable one-star
and five-star SSF boundaries occurred at predicted levels
of rollover risk of 10 percent and 40 percent, permitting
three equal intervals of risk between them divisible by ten
for the two-star, three-star and four-star boundaries. Having
the star rating intervals bounded at 10, 20, 30 and 40 percent
rollover risk levels would make the meaning of the ratings
easier to explain to consumers. Figure 2 presents the proposed
rating system in graphical form. The updated linear regression
curve in Figure 1 is nearly identical to the linear regression
curve in Figure 2, except that it would set the one star boundary
for 40 percent rollover risk at 1.03 instead of 1.04.
NHTSA has examined vehicle stability on and off for 30 years
without promulgating a rule; however, the agency began a consumer
information rollover resistance rating in 2001 ranking new
cars and light trucks based on Static Stability Factor (SSF).
In response to the Ford/Firestone debacle, Congress ordered
NHTSA, through the TREAD Act passed in November 2000, to develop
a dynamic test for rollover resistance. The Phase IV report
summarizes the testing and rates various on-road rollover
resistance tests and was the basis from which NHTSA announced
it would begin testing vehicles using J-turn and fishhook
maneuvers. Real-world injury and fatality data continue to
show the significant dangers associated with rollovers, forcing
the issue to become a regulatory priority. Data compiled from
federal sources indicate rollovers are the second most dangerous
crash type (second only to head-on collisions). Fatality data
from 2000 show 9,882 occupants were killed in light vehicle
rollovers, 8,146 of which were single vehicle crashes. Not
surprising, light trucks stand out: 78 percent of single-vehicle
crashes in SUVs involved rollover; 63 percent for pickups
and 60 percent for vans and minivans. Passenger car occupant
fatalities in single vehicle crashes involving rollovers accounted
for 46 percent. Data from 1996-2000 estimate 61,000 occupants
receive incapacitating or fatal injuries annually in rollover
crashes. These data also indicate 212,000 single vehicle rollovers
resulted in 50,000 incapacitating injuries or fatalities.
|